- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 30 November 2023
- Bench
- B.Pugalendhi
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 14713/2017
Judgment
ORDER When the writ petition is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel appearing for petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement so.
2.Recording the above submission and the endorsement, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
30.11.2023 Internet : Yes / No To
1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Limited, Dugar Towers, 6th Floor, Old No.34, New No.123, Marshalls Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.
2.The District Collector, District Collector Office, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovilpatti, Kovilpatti Division, Thoothukudi District.
4.The Special Tahsildar, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi Collectorate, Thoothukudi District.
B.PUGALENDHI, J. dsk
30.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated: 30.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI and WMP(MD)No.11542 of 2017 Radhakrishnan ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation Limited, Dugar Towers, 6th Floor, Old No.34, New No.123, Marshalls Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008. 2.The District Collector, District Collector Office, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kovilpatti, Kovilpatti Division, Thoothukudi District. 4.The Special Tahsildar, Tamil Nadu Arasu Cable TV Corporation, Thoothukudi, Thoothukudi Collectorate, Thoothukudi District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of mandamus directing directing the 1 and 2nd respondents to take legal action against the 4th respondent for disturbing the petitioner's signal and consequently direct the 4th respondent to provide clear signal to the petitioner based on the petitioner's representation dated 31.07.2017. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Prasanna Vinoth For Respondents : Mr.PT.Thiraviam, Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.