Janakiraman v. Rajalakshmi

JUDGMENT The learned counsel appearing for the appellants submitted that the sole respondent passed away long before.

¶2When this matter was taken up for hearing on 15.04.2014, this Court granted time to the appellants to implead the legal representatives of the deceased sole respondent. However, till date, the appellants have not taken steps to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased sole respondent.

¶3In view of the same, the Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

11.08.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi To

1.The Principal District Judge, Pudukkottai

2.The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Keeranur

3.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

, J.

mbi

11.08.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.08.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY S.A.(MD)No.235 of 2005 & C.M.P.(MD)No.2119 of 2005 1.Janakiraman 2.Jayaraman 3.Beeshmachari 4.Subramanian Ayyaswami 5.Muthu Nayakkar @ Muthukrishna Naidu 6.K.Rukmani ...Appellants vs. Rajalakshmi ... Respondent (Cause title accepted vide order dated 01.03.2005 in C.M.P.(MD)No. 1636 of 2005 and 04.03.2005 in S.A.(MD)No.235 of 2005) Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 08.01.2003 in A.S.No. 23 of 2001 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Pudukkottai confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 25.09.2000 in O.S.No.256 of 1995 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Keeranur. For Appellants : Mr.D.Ramesh kannan For Respondent : No appearance