VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Senthilarumugam.M v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
28 November 2023
Bench
S.M. Subramaniamauthor, V. Lakshminarayanan
Case no.
WP(MD) 25479/2023

Judgment

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) With reference to the relief sought for in the present Writ Petition to complete the enquiry proceedings, the learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 has made a submission that enquiry report has been furnished by the Revenue Tahsildar to the authorities competent. Thus, the official respondents are directed to proceed with the enquiry by following the procedures as contemplated under the Act and by affording opportunity to the parties concerned and pass final orders within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

2.Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. (S.M.S., J.) & (V.L.N., J.)

28.11.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Yuva To

1.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.

3.The Tahsildar, Nanguneri Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND

V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J. Yuva

28.11.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN M.Senthilarumugam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District. 3.The Tahsildar, Nanguneri Taluk, Tirunelveli District. 4.A.Piramangam 5.The Secretary, The Bar Council of Tamilnadu and Puducherry, High Court Campus, Chennai. ...Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to complete the enquiry and submit a report as directed by the 1st respondent vide communication dated 06.01.2022 in Na.Ka.A1/513/2022 and consequently, to direct the 1st respondent to pass an order on the representation dated 03.01.2022 within the stipulated time as fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Vadivelan For R1 to R3 : Mr.R.Baskaran, Additional Advocate General, assisted by Mr.M.Senthil Ayyanar, Government Advocate For R4 : Mr.S.Palanivelayutham For R5 : No Appearance

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.