Vijaya Boopathy v. Kay Pee Yes Trust Kodaikanal

JUDGMENT In an earlier occasion, there was no representation on the side of the Appellant. Since the Appellant has not represented either by Counsel or by himself to prosecute the matter, this case was posted today (i.e. 15.12.2023) under the caption 'either for disposal or for dismissal'.

¶2Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the Learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant has filed a memo and reported no instructions from the Appellant. The said memo, dated

15.12.2024 is recorded.

¶3Recording the aforesaid memo, the Second Appeal is dismissed. No Costs.

15.12.2023 Index : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No ksa TO:

¶1The Additional Sub Court, Dindigul.

¶2The Principal District Munsif Court, Dindigul.

¶3The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

S.SRIMATHY, J.

ksa S.A.(MD)No.380 of 2017

15.12.2023

THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Vijaya Boopathy ... Appellant /Vs./ 1. Kay Pee Yes Trust Kodaikanal Through its Board of Trustees, M.L.Bright, S/o.Late.rEV.bRIGHT dAVID, Kodaikanal Public School, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District. 2. Vimala Bright 3. Angel Johnson 4. Maureen Jayaraj 5. Karuna David 6. Deepthi Jayaraj 7. Jaya Suresh Jayaraj ...Respondents P RAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the Decree and Judgment dated 28.09.2016 passed in A.S.No.34 of 2012 on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Dindigul, confirming the Judgment and Decree, dated 05.03.2012 made in O.S.No.655 of 2006 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Dindigul. For Appellant : Mr.Antony Arulraj For Respondents : Mr.K.Hemakarthikeyan