Janardhanan v. Vincent

JUDGMENT In an earlier occasion, there was no representation on the side of the Appellant. Since the Appellant has not represented either by Counsel or by himself to prosecute the matter, this case was posted today (i.e. 16.11.2023) under the caption 'for dismissal'. Today also the Appellant is not represented by his Counsel and he is not present in person, which shows that the Appellant is interested in prosecuting the Second Appeal.

¶2Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No Costs.

16.11.2023 Index : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No ksa TO: The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

S.SRIMATHY, J.

ksa S.A.(MD)No.119 of 2017

16.11.2023

THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Janardhanan ... Appellant /Vs./ 1. Vincent 2. Vavarai Panchayat, Represented by its President. 3. Kunjammal 4. Vijayalakshmi 5. Sanantha Rajan 6. Pirithvirajan 7. Sivarajan 8. Rosamma 9. Ponnappan 10. Sugumaran ...Respondents [Respondents 3, 5 to 7, 9 & 10 are given up, vide order of this Court, dated 07.02.2017] P RAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code to set aside the Decree and Judgment dated 21.04.2014 made in A.S.No.42 of 2009 on the file of the Learned Subordinate Judge, Kuzhithurai, reversing the decree and judgment dated 25.11.2009 made in O.S.No.549 of 2001 on the file of the Learned II Additional District Munsif, Kuzhithurai. For Appellants : No appearance For R-2 : Mr.R.Anandharaj