- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 12 December 2023
- Bench
- K.Murali Shankar
- Case no.
- CRP(MD) 3141/2023
Judgment
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.12.2023 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR and C.M.P.(MD)No.16156 of 2023 Saraswathi
... Petitioner in both petitions Vs.
¶1Balakrishnan
¶2Balu Mahindran
¶3Selvaraj ... Respondents in both petitions Common Prayer : These Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal orders dated
08.08.2023 in I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2023 in O.S.No.20 of 2022 on the file of District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Singampunari by allowing the civil revision petitions. (in both petitions) For Petitioner : Mr.K.Baalasundharam, Senior Counsel for M/s.KBS Law Office COMMON ORDER These Civil Revision Petitions are directed against the orders passed in I.A.Nos.1 of 2023 and 2 of 2023 in O.S.No.20 of 2022 dated
08.08.2023, on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Singampunari, dismissing the applications one for impleadment filed under Order 1 Rule 10(2) C.P.C. and the other one to reopen the case.
¶2The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the revision petitioner would submit that the revision petitioner/plaintiff has filed the above suit as joint family manager, that the respondents/defendants have raised a defence questioning the locus standi of the revision petitioner/ plaintiff to file the suit, that the revision petitioner/plaintiff's husband was in Malaysia at the time of filing the suit and that since he has returned to India and to avoid technical objections, the above applications came to be filed for impleading her husband, but that application was ordered to be dismissed.
¶3The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the revision petitioner would further submit that since the revision petitioner/plaintiff has no capacity to file the suit as joint family manager, she may be permitted to file an application seeking permission to withdraw the suit with liberty to file a fresh suit.
¶4Recording the submissions made by the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the revision petitioner, these Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed and the revision petitioner is at liberty to file an application before the concerned Court seeking permission for withdrawing the suit in O.S.No.20 of 2022 with liberty to file a fresh suit with the same cause of action. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.
12.12.2023 NCC :yes/No Index :yes/No Internet:yes/No csm To
¶1The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Singampunari.
2.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. C.R.P.(MD)Nos.3141oando3142oofo2023 oK.MURALIoSHANKARoo,Jo. csm Orderomadeoin C.R.P.(MD)Nos.3141oando3142oofo2023 and C.M.P.(MD)No.16156oofo2023 Datedo:o12.12.2023
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.