VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

M.Kathiravan v. Pechiammal

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
31 October 2023
Bench
Battu Devanandauthor
Case no.
CRP(MD) 2109/2019

Judgment

ORDER This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order dated

08.08.2019 in I.A.No.2 of 2019 in O.S.No.328 of 2010 on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Srivilliputhur.

¶2This Court, by order dated 19.10.2023, called for a report from the concerned Principal District Judge with regard to the status of O.S.No.328 of 2010 in the trial Court. Accordingly, the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Virudhunagar District at Srivilliputtur, has sent a report, wherein it is stated that the suit in O.S.No.328 of 2010 on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Srivilliputhur, was disposed of by order dated 02.02.2021.

¶3In view of the above, as already the suit itself was disposed of, in the considered opinion of this Court, nothing survives in this Civil Revision Petition.

¶4Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶5There shall be no order as to costs.

¶6Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

31.10.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes abr To The Additional Sub Judge, Srivilliputhur. C.R.P.(MD)oNo.2109oofo2019 BATTUoDEVANAND,oJ. abr C.R.P.(MD)oNo.2109oofo2019 Datedo:o31.10.2023 Pageo4oofo4

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 31.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND and C.M.P.(MD) No.10974 of 2019 M.Kathiravan .. Petitioner/Petitioner/ Defendant Vs. Pechiammal .. Respondent/Respondent/ Plaintiff Prayer: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set aside the order dated 08.08.2019 in I.A.No.2 of 2019 in O.S.No.328 of 2010 on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Srivilliputhur. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Baskar Mathuram For Respondent : Mr.M.Thirunavukkarasu

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.