VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

The Tuticorin District Video v. The District Registar

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
24 March 2023
Bench
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 7545/2016

Judgment

O R D E R On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by subsequent events. By taking note of the same, W.P.(MD).No.7545 of 2016 is dismissed as infructuous without any order as to costs.

24.03.2023 NCC :No Internet :Yes Index :No ssb To The District Registrar (Administration) Tuticorin.

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. ssb

24.03.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :24.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY The Tuticorin District Video and Photographers Association (Reg.No.103/92) Rep.by its Secretary, N.Jeevanandam, 79A, V.E.Road, Tuticorin-2. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Registrar (Administration) Tuticorin. 2.S.Mohan Raj ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the order passed by the first respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No.4041/A3/2015 dated 18.03.2016 and quash the same as illegal in respect to the part of refusing to accept the Form-VII filed by the petitioner and consequently direct the first respondent to take the Form-VII filed by the petitioner. For Petitioner :Mr.T.A.Ebenezer For Respondents :Mr.M.Prakash Additional Government Pleader for R1 Mr.B.N.Rajamohamed for R2

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.