Raja Singh, v. The Special District Revenue

O R D E R On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner received compensation in relation to the acquisition. As such, the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition.

2.Accordingly, W.P.(MD).No.6650 of 2016 is disposed of without any order as to costs. Consequently, connected W.M.P.(MD).No.5760 of 2016 is closed.

16.03.2023 NCC :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No sbn To

1.The Special District Revenue Officer, (Land Acquisition) Tamil Nadu Highways Department Scheme-I, Tirunelveli-11.

2.The Divisional Engineer, Highways, Tamil Nadu Road Sector Project, Back side of VMS Marriage Hall, Maharaja Nagar, Tirunelveli-11. W.P.(Mi)No.6650oofo2016 SENTHILKUMARoRAMAMOORTHY,oJ. sbn W.P.(MD)No.6650oofo2016 and W.M.P.(MD).No.5760oofo2016

16.03.2023 Pageo4oofo4

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :16.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and W.M.P.(MD).No.5760 of 2016 Raja Singh ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Special District Revenue Officer, (Land Acquisition) Tamil Nadu Highways Department Scheme-I, Tirunelveli-11. 2.The Divisional Engineer, Highways, Tamil Nadu Road Sector Project, Back side of VMS Marriage Hall, Maharaja Nagar, Tirunelveli-11. ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned notice in Na.Ka.19/2014/A1 dated 04.09.2014 of the first respondent and to quash the same and consequently forbear the respondents from developing Idaiyankudi-Bharathar Ovari road without following the procedures contemplated under the Tamil Nadu Highway Act, 2001. For Petitioner :Mrs.Jeya Revathy For Respondents :Mr.M.Sarangan Additional Government Pleader