- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 6 April 2023
- Bench
- Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 6302/2016
Judgment
O R D E R At the hearing on 30.03.2023, it was recorded that there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was listed today under the caption for dismissal. Once again, there is no representation for the petitioner.
¶2Therefore, W.P.(MD).No.6302 of 2016 is dismissed for non-prosecution without any order as to costs. Consequently, connected W.M.P.(MD).No.5531 of 2016 is closed.
06.04.2023 NCC :No Internet :Yes Index :No ssb To The District Revenue Officer, Pudukottai District. W.P.(Mi)No.6302oofo2016 SENTHILKUMARoRAMAMOORTHY,oJ. ssb W.P.(MD)No.6302oofo2016 and W.M.P.(MD).No.5531oofo2016
06.04.2023 Pageo4oofo4
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :06.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and W.M.P.(MD).No.5531 of 2016 V.C.Panneerselvam ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer, Pudukottai District. 2.Karuppusamy 3.Gunasekaran 4.Vinson 5.Senthil Kumar ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records from the first respondent in proceedings made in Na.Ka.D3/20585/2015 dated 15.12.2015 and quash the same. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents :Mr.D.Farjana Ghoushia Special Government Pleader for R1 Mr.M.Venkatesan for R2 and R3 No-appearance for R4
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.