Sriram, S/O. Pandaram, v. The Commissioner,

ORDER The petitioner assails a plan sanction granted by the first respondent to the second respondent.

¶2The learned counsel for the second respondent states that pursuant to the grant of plan sanction, the second respondent completed the construction of a house on the relevant property. In these circumstances, nothing survives for adjudication in this challenge to the plan sanction. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner and the second respondent submit that civil proceedings are pending between the parties. By leaving it open to the parties to workout their remedies in the pending civil proceedings, W.P.(MD)No.5159 of 2016 is disposed of without any orders as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

15.03.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes / No pnn To The Commissioner, Vickramasingapuram Municipality, Vickramasingapuram - 627 425, Ambasamudram Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. pnn

15.03.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 15.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.P(MD).No.5159 of 2016 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.4612 and 4613 of 2016 Sriram ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Commissioner, Vickramasingapuram Municipality, Vickramasingapuram - 627 425, Ambasamudram Taluk, Tirunelveli District. 2.Sumathi ... Respondents Prayer:- Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India to issue a writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the impugned plan approval granted by the 1st respondent in Ka.Ma.No.114/2015, dated 09.10.2015 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.N.C.Ashokkumar For R1 : Mr.H.Arumugam For R2 : Mr.M.Saravanan