- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 23 March 2023
- Bench
- Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 4826/2016
Judgment
O R D E R The petitioner has assailed the orders dated 19.11.2015 and
05.11.2015 of the second respondent, by which the building permission requested for by the 5th to 7th respondents was granted.
¶2Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner initiated proceedings before the jurisdictional Civil Court in respect of the property in question. Since the petitioner was unsuccessful in the first appeal, S.A.Nos.150 and 151 of 2017 were filed and the said appeals are pending adjudication. Learned Senior counsel submits fairly that the petitioner has to establish title to the relevant property in the two appeals in order to succeed. Therefore, he makes a request that the petition be disposed of by leaving it open to the contesting private parties to work out their remedies in the civil Court.
¶3In light of the above submissions, the impugned orders do not call for interference and W.P(MD).No.4826 of 2016 is disposed of by leaving it open to the parties to work out their remedies in the civil proceedings. There shall be no order as to costs.
23.03.2023 NCC :No Internet :Yes Index :No sbn/ssb To
1.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.
2.The Executive Officer, Special Grade Panchayat, Courtallam-627 802.
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. sbn/ssb
23.03.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :23.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY Krishnakanthan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli. 2.The Executive Officer, Special Grade Panchayat, Courtallam-627 802. 3.Rani @ Samundeeswari 4.Nithin Sha 5.Radhakrishnan 6.Sundar 7.Valarmathi ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the second respondent in Ka.Vi.No.12/2015-2016 dated 19.11.2015 and Ka.Vi.No.9/2015-2016 dated 05.11.2015 and quash the same. For Petitioner :Mr.V.Janakidevi For Respondents :Mr.C.Baskaran Government Advocate for R1 Mr.M.Rajarajan for R2 Mr.M.Saravanan for R6 and R7 No-appearance for R3 and R4 R5-Tapal Due
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.