- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 6 March 2023
- Bench
- Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 4766/2016
Judgment
O R D E R The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has been instructed to withdraw the Writ Petition. He has made an endorsement for the said purpose. By recording the same, WP(MD)No.4766/2016 is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
06.03.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Speaking / Non-speaking order mbi
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. mbi
06.03.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.03.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP(MD)No.4766 of 2016 & WMP(MD)No.4288/2016 S.Kalibulla ... Petitioner Vs 1.The Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Pattinapakam, Chennai 28. 2.The Sub Registrar, Pudukottai, Pudukottai District. 3.The District Registrar, Pudukottai, Pudukottai District. 4.Sankar ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the third respondent to hold an enquiry and pass orders on the representation made by the petitioner on 07.10.2015 taken on the file of the second respondent as S.No.3562 in light of Circular No.67 dated 03.11.2011 issued by the first respondent herein and the order made by this Court in Ramasamy vs. State of Tamil Nadu 2014 (4) CTC 627 within the time that may be stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Mahaboob Athiff For Respondents : Mr.C.Satheesh, Government Advocate for R1 to R3 Mr.K.N.Govardhanan for R4
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.