K.R.Kuppusamy v. The District Collector

ORDER The writ petitioner has assailed an order dated 11.01.2016 of the Tahsildar, South Taluk (Social Welfare), Madurai.

2.At the hearing today, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent has placed before me a communication dated 30.07.2016 in terms whereof, payment of pension has been ordered. The learned counsel for the petitioner confirmed that the petitioner is receiving pension pursuant to the order dated 30.07.2016. As such, the grievance of the petitioner has been addressed.

3.Recording the same, W.P.(MD)No.3513 of 2016 is disposed of without any order as to costs.

07.03.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No gns To

1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Tahsildar, South Taluk (Social Welfare), Madurai. Bodinayakanur, Theni District.

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.

gns

07.03.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY K.R.Kuppusamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Tahsildar, South Taluk (Social Welfare), Madurai. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining of the impugned order passed by the second respondent in 10583/2015/C1 dated 11.01.2016 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the second respondent to grant old age pension to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Mohamed Salim For Respondent : Mr.S.Kameshwaran, Government Advocate.