VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Esthar Daisy Rani v. The District Collector

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
11 December 2023
Bench
B.Pugalendhiauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 24903/2016

Judgment

ORDER Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the writ petition becomes infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

11.12.2023 ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To

¶1The District Collector, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur.

¶2The Deputy Director, Directorate of Town and Country Planning, 33, Rajappa Nagar 4th Street, Medical College Road, Thanjavur – 613 007.

¶3The Block Development Officer, Tiruvaiyaru, Thanjavur District.

¶4The President, Punavasal Village Panchayat, Thhiruvaiyaru Taluk, Thanjavur District.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ogy

11.12.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Esthar Daisy Rani ... Petitioner versus 1. The District Collector, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur. 2. The Deputy Director, Directorate of Town and Country Planning, 33, Rajappa Nagar 4th Street, Medical College Road, Thanjavur – 613 007. 3. The Block Development Officer, Tiruvaiyaru, Thanjavur District. 4. The President, Punavasal Village Panchayat, Thhiruvaiyaru Taluk, Thanjavur District. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order of the 4th respondent dated 27.07.2015 and quash the same and consequently, direct the 4th respondent to accord permission for constructing house in Plot No.39 in Survey Nos.178/6, 178/7 and 178/8 in Punavasal Village, Thiruvaiyaru Taluk, Thanjavur District. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Antony Arulraj For Respondents : Mr.J.K.Jeyaseelan, Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.