VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Kandasamy, v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
14 March 2023
Bench
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 2441/2016

Judgment

O R D E R The petitioner has assailed an order dated 10.06.2014 in respect of Patta No.1497. The primary grievance of the petitioner is that the second respondent issued the impugned patta without providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner.

¶2Learned counsel for the petitioner invited my attention to paragraph 4 and 5 of the counter affidavit of the second respondent and pointed out that it is admitted therein that the relevant files pertaining to the enquiry were misplaced. Learned counsel further points out that the second respondent has agreed to conduct a fresh enquiry.

¶3Learned Government Advocate has placed before me a communication dated 06.03.2023 from the Thasildar, Manmangalam, whereby the parties have been called for an enquiry on 15.03.2023 at

03.00p.m.

¶4In view of the statement in the counter affidavit that the relevant files pertaining to the alleged enquiry conducted by the second respondent have been misplaced, the impugned order is not sustainable. Consequently, the impugned order is quashed and the matter is remanded to the Thasildar, Manmangalam, for fresh enquiry. Such enquiry shall be conducted after providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner and the third and fourth respondents herein. A reasoned order shall be passed upon the conclusion of the enquiry and the entire process shall be concluded within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶5W.P.(MD).No.2441 of 2016 is disposed of on these terms, without any order as to costs. Consequently, connected W.M.P.(MD).No. 2195 of 2016 is closed.

14.03.2023 NCC :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No sbn To

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kulithalai, Karur District.

2.The Headquarters Deputy Tahsildar, Manmangalam Village, Manmangalam Taluk, Karur District. W.P.(Mi)No.2441oofo2016 SENTHILKUMARoRAMAMOORTHY,oJ. sbn W.P.(MD)No.2441oofo2016 and W.M.P.(MD).No.2195oofo2016

14.03.2023 Pageo5oofo5

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :14.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and W.M.P.(MD).No.2195 of 2016 Kandasamy ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kulithalai, Karur District. 2.The Headquarters Deputy Tahsildar, Manmangalam Village, Manmangalam Taluk, Karur District. 3.Sekar, 4.Periyasamy ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned patta proceedings to the second respondent dated 10.06.2014 in respect of Patta No.1497 quash the same and consequently directing the second respondent to restore the patta exclusively the name of the petitioner. For Petitioner :Mr.N.Shanmugaselvam For Respondents :Mr.S.Kameswaran Government Advocate for R1 & R2 :Mr.L.Prabakaran for R3 & R4

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.