H.Shajahan, v. The District Revenue

O R D E R The dispute is between the petitioner, on the one hand, and the third respondent on the other. In relation thereto, the petitioner assailed an order dated 17.03.2015 of the second respondent and the order dated

21.12.2015 of the first respondent.

¶2Learned Additional Government Pleader has placed before me a communication from the Tahsildar, Kalkulam. In such communication, it is stated that pursuant to discussions, an amicable understanding was arrived at between the petitioner and the third respondent.

¶3By taking note of the subsequent development, W.P.(MD).No. 2339 of 2016 is disposed of without any order as to costs. Consequently, connected W.M.P.(MD).No.2063 of 2016 is closed.

28.03.2023 NCC :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No sbn To

1.The District Revenue Officer, Kanyakumari District, Kanyakumari.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Padmanabapuram, Kanyakumari District.

3.The Tahsildar, Kalkulam Taluk, Kanyakumari District. W.P.(Mi)No.2339oofo2016 SENTHILKUMARoRAMAMOORTHY,oJ. sbn W.P.(MD)No.2339oofo2016 and W.M.P.(MD).No.2063oofo2016

28.03.2023 Pageo4oofo4

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :28.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and W.M.P.(MD).No.2063 of 2016 H.Shajahan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer, Kanyakumari District, Kanyakumari. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Padmanabapuram, Kanyakumari District. 3.Chellammal 4.The Tahsildar, Kalkulam Taluk, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned order of the second respondent in A3/4290/2014 dated 17.03.2015 and the impugned order made by the first respondent in M4/28114/15 dated 21.12.2015 and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner :Mr.P.Mohamed Suhail for M/s.Ajmal Associates For Respondents :Mr.M.Sarangan Additional Government Pleader for R1, R2 & R4 :Mr.M.Suresh for R3