- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 22 September 2023
- Bench
- Battu Devanand
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 20924/2016
Judgment
O R D E R It is represented before this Court that the learned counsel for the petitioner is no more. Accordingly, on 27.07.2023, this Court directed the Registry to issue notice to the petitioner. As per the endorsement made by the Registry, notice sent to the petitioner is returned with an endorsement that 'no such addressee is available'. Accordingly, this Court by order dated 08.09.2023 directed the Registry to print the name of the petitioner in the cause list and posted the matter on 22.09.2023. Today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. It appears the petitioner has no interest to prosecute the case.
¶2Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
¶3No costs.
¶4Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
22.09.2023 Index : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No CM To,
¶1The State represented by The Inspector of General of Police, Dr. Radhakirhsnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai – 600 004.
¶2The Commissioner of Police, Tiruchirappalli.
¶3The Deputy Commissioner, Trichirappalli City, Armed Forces, Trichy.
BATTU DEVANAND, J. CM W.P. (MD)No.20924 of 2016 and W.M.P. (MD) No. 14934 of 2016
22.09.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.09.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND W.P.(MD)No.20924 of 2016 and W.M.P. (MD) No. 14934 of 2016 M. Mumtaj Begum ...Petitioner Vs. 1. The State represented by The Inspector of General of Police, Dr. Radhakirhsnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai – 600 004. 2. The Commissioner of Police, Tiruchirappalli. 3. The Deputy Commissioner, Trichirappalli City, Armed Forces, Trichy. ....Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the proceedings of the 2nd respondent made in Na.Ka.No.E3/29673/2015/Ma.A.No.869/2015 dated 16.11.2015 and quash the same as of no legal consequence and consequently direct the respondents to restore the petitioners to her services as that of the Home Guard with all monetary benefits . For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.A.Sivanu Pandian Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.