- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 5 April 2023
- Bench
- Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 20209/2016
Judgment
O R D E R At the hearing on 29.03.2023, it was recorded that there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was listed today under the caption for dismissal. Once again, there is no representation for the petitioner.
¶2Therefore, W.P.(MD).No.20209 of 2016 is dismissed for non-prosecution without any order as to costs. Consequently, connected W.M.P.
(MD).No.14492 of 2016 is closed.
05.04.2023 NCC :No Internet :Yes Index :No PKN To
¶1The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai Dist.
¶2The Revenue Divisional Officer, Karaikudi Taluk, Sivagangai District.
¶3The Tahsildar, Karaikudi Taluk, Sivagangai District.
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. PKN W.P.(MD)No.20209 of 2016
05.04.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :05.04.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.P.(MD)No.20209 of 2016 and W.M.P (MD) No. 14492 of 2016 K.Ganesan ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The District Revenue Officer, Sivagangai District. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Karaikudi Taluk, Sivagangai District. 3. The Tahsildar, Karaikudi Taluk, Sivagangai District. 4. R.Kathirvelu . ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the 1st respondent in Na.Ka.No.B1-2765-2015 dated 23.09.2016 and quash the same as illegal and arbitrary. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.S.Kameswaran Government Advocate for R1 to R3
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.