- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 28 March 2023
- Bench
- Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 19690/2016
Judgment
O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has been instructed to withdraw the writ petition. He has made an endorsement for the said purpose. By taking note of the same, W.P.(MD).No.19690 of 2016 is dismissed as withdrawn without any order as to costs.
28.03.2023 NCC :No Internet :Yes Index :No ssb To The Tahsildar Office of the Taluk Office, Natham, Dindigul District.
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. ssb
28.03.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :28.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY K.Ponnuchamy ... Petitioner Vs. The Tahsildar Office of the Taluk Office, Natham, Dindigul District. ... Respondent PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent herein to enter the petitioner name as a cultivating tenant in respect of the property comprised in Survey No.764/5 A2 measuring 0.59 ½ cents towards the northern side situated Nadumandalam Village, Natham Taluk, Dindigul District, on the basis of the petitioner representation dated 09.05.2016 within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner :Mr.B.Jameel Arasu For Respondents :Mr.S.Deenadhayalan
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.