Ravichandran M v. The Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate

O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.] When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent submitted that the petitioner has paid the entire outstanding amount to the respondent bank and the loan account of the petitioner has been closed and hence, nothing survives in this Writ Petition and therefore, the writ petition may be closed as infructuous.

¶2In view of the aforesaid submissions, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

[D.K.K., J.] [L.V.G., J.]

01.03.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No vsm To The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai District. oD.KRISHNAKUMARoo,oJo. and L.VICTORIAoGOWRI,oJ. vsm W.P.(MD)No.24126oofo2022

01.03.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.03.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.18234 & 18235 of 2022 M.Ravichandran ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai District. 2.The Authorized Officer / Branch Manager, IDFC First Bank Ltd., No.79/2, 1st Street, Bye-Pass Road, Madurai – 625 016. 3.Mr.Gopalakrishnan, Ms.No.877/1993, The Advocate Commissioner, District Court, Madurai – 625 020. (Appointed vide order dated 18.04.2022 in Cr.M.P.No.270/2022 by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai.) ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records culminating into the Notice dated 14.10.2022 issued by the 3rd respondent, based upon the order dated 18.04.2022 in Cr.M.P.No.270/2022 u/s.14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial assets and enforcement of security interest Act (SARFAESI Act) passed by the 1st respondent and set aside the same as illegal. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Vishnuram For Respondents : Mr.A.Sivasubramanian for R2 No Appearance for R1 & R3