Anandi, W/O. Moorthy, v. The District Collector

O R D E R At the hearing on 20.03.2023, it was recorded that there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was listed today under the caption for dismissal. Once again, there is no representation for the petitioner.

¶2Therefore, W.P.(MD).No.18073 of 2016 is dismissed for non-prosecution without any order as to costs. Consequently, connected W.M.P.

(MD).Nos.13042 and 13043 of 2016 are closed.

27.03.2023 NCC :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No sbn To

1.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Tirunelveli District.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirunelveli Taluk, Tirunelveli District.

4.The Tahsildar, Tirunelveli Taluk, Tirunelveli District. W.P.(Mi)No.1807aoofo2016 SENTHILKUMARoRAMAMOORTHY,oJ. sbn W.P.(MD)No.18073oofo2016 and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.13042o&o13043oofo2016

27.03.2023 Pageo4oofo4

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :27.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.13042 & 13043 of 2016 Anandi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Tirunelveli District. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Tirunelveli District. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirunelveli Taluk, Tirunelveli District. 4.The Tahsildar, Tirunelveli Taluk, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents (Cause title amended vide Court order dated 02.11.2016 in W.M.P. (MD).No.14476 of 2016 by VBDJ) PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the third respondent in Pa.Mu.A2/3002/2016 dated 22.08.2016, so far as petitioner concerned and quash the same and further direct the respondents 1 to 4 not to disturb the peaceful possession and occupation of the petitioner. For Petitioner :No appearance For Respondents :Mr.M.Sarangan Additional Government Pleader