Lakshmiammal, v. The District Revenue Officer

O R D E R At the hearing on 17.03.2023, it was recorded that there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was listed today under the caption for dismissal. Once again, there is no representation for the petitioner.

¶2Therefore, W.P.(MD).No.16889 of 2016 is dismissed for non-prosecution without any order as to costs. Consequently, connected W.M.P.

(MD).No.12253 of 2016 is closed.

31.03.2023 NCC :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No sbn To The District Revenue Officer Cum Additional District Administrative Magistrate, Collectorate, Madurai 625 020. W.P.(Mi)No.16889oofo2016 SENTHILKUMARoRAMAMOORTHY,oJ. sbn oW.P.(MD)No.16889ooofo2016o and W.M.P.(MD).No.12253oofo2016

31.03.2023 Pageo4oofo4

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :31.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and W.M.P.(MD).No.12253 of 2016 Lakshmiammal ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Revenue Officer Cum Additional District Administrative Magistrate, Collectorate, Madurai 625 020. 2.Ayyavuthevar, 3.Paulsamy Thevar 4.Chinnathevar 5.Peyathevar. ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the Impugned order passed by the first respondent in his proceedings in Ni.Mu/33014/2012/G5, dated 23.06.2016 and quash the same illegal and consequently direct the first respondent to conduct a fresh enquiry, after affording a fair opportunity to the petitioner within a time frame. For Petitioner :No appearance For Respondents :Mrs.D.Farjana Ghoushia Special Government Pleader for R1 :Unserved for R2 to R5