VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

A.Earnest Balasingh v. The State of Tamil Nadu

DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
28 March 2023
Bench
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 16470/2016

Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :28.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.12032, 12033, 12054 & 12055 of 2016 W.P.(MD).No.16470 of 2016 A.Earnest Balasingh ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by the Secretary to Government,

4.The Tirunelveli Diocese Trust Association (TDTA) Rep by its Secretary, ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the second respondent in Na.Ka.No. 25412/F4/2015 dated 30.06.2016 approving the fifth respondent as Correspondent to St.Jhon's College, Palayamkottai and quash the same and further directing the second respondent to make direct payment to the employees of St.Jhon College, Palayamkottai. For Petitioner :No appearance For Respondents :Mr.M.Ramesh Government Advocate for R1 to R3 :No appearance for R4 & R5 ****** W.P.(MD).No.16521 of 2016 A.Earnest Balasingh ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by the Secretary to Government,

4.The Tirunelveli Diocese Trust Association (TDTA) Rep by its Secretary, ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the second respondent in Na.Ka.No. 25412/F4/2015 approving the fifth respondent as Correspondent to Sarah Tucker Collegem Perumalpuram and quash the same and further directing the second respondent to make direct payment to the employees of Sarah Tucker Collegem Perumalpuram. For Petitioner :No appearance For Respondents :Mr.M.Ramesh Government Advocate for R1 to R3 :No appearance for R4 & R5 ****** COMMON ORDER Learned Government Advocate submits that these writ petitions have been rendered infructuous by subsequent events.

¶2At the hearing on 21.03.2023, it was recorded that there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, these matters were listed today under the caption for dismissal. Once again, there is no representation for the petitioner.

3.Therefore, W.P.(MD).Nos.16470 and 16521 of 2016 are dismissed for non-prosecution without any order as to costs. Consequently, connected W.M.P.(MD).Nos.12032, 12033, 12054 and 12055 of 2016 are closed.

28.03.2023 NCC :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No sbn To

1.The Secretary to Government, The State of Tamil Nadu,

4.The Secretary, The Tirunelveli Diocese Trust Association (TDTA) W.P.(Mi)Nos.16470o&o16521oofo2016 SENTHILKUMARoRAMAMOORTHY,oJ. sbn W.P.(MD)Nos.16470o&o16521oofo2016 and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.12032,o12033,o12054o&o12055oofo2016

28.03.2023 Pageo6oofo6

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.