VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

M.Kaliraj, S/O. Madasamy, v. The District Collector

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
16 March 2023
Bench
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 16008/2016

Judgment

O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has been rendered infructuous by subsequent events.

¶2By taking note of the same, W.P. (MD) No.16008 of 2016 is dismissed as infructuous without any order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

16.03.2023 NCC :No Internet :Yes Index :No PKN To

¶1The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

¶2The Special Tahsildar, Tamilnadu Arasu Cable Tv Corporation, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi.

¶3The Inspector of Police, Kovilpatti East Police Station, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District.

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. PKN W.P.(MD)No.16008 of 2016

16.03.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :16.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.P.(MD)No.16008 of 2016 and W.M.P (MD) Nos. 11712 and 12476 of 2016, 6571 and 6572 of 2017 M.Kaliraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The District Collector, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi. 2. The Special Tahsildar, Tamilnadu Arasu Cable Tv Corporation, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi. 3. The Inspector of Police, Kovilpatti East Police Station, Kovilpatti, Thoothukudi District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pursuant to the impugned order of the 2nd respondent dated 02.03.2016 vide proceedings No.Tha.Na.AKTV/129/2015 and quash the same and consequentially direct the respondents herein from illegally interfering with the cable TV business of the petitioner without due process of law. For Petitioner :Ms.Porkodi Karnan For Respondents :Mr.M.Sarangan Additional Government Pleader for R1 Mr.R.Sivakumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R3 Mr.David Sundar Singh Standing Counsel for R2

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.