T.T.Manohara Boopathy v. The District Revenue Officer

O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has been rendered infructuous by subsequent events.

¶2By taking note of the same, W.P. (MD) No.13757 of 2016 is dismissed as infructuous without any order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

21.03.2023 NCC :No Internet :Yes Index :No PKN To

¶1The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District, Madurai.

¶2The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vadipatti, Madurai District.

¶3The Tahsildar, Vadipatti, Madurai District.

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. PKN W.P.(MD)No.13757 of 2016

21.03.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :21.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.P.(MD)No.13757 of 2016 and W.M.P (MD) No. 10262 of 2016 T.T.Manohara Boopathy ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District, Madurai. 2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Vadipatti, Madurai District. 3. The Tahsildar, Vadipatti, Madurai District. 4. T.Logambal ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka.No. G2/32405/2012 dated 29.02.2016 conforming the order dated 28.03.2012 passed by the 2nd respondent in his proceedings in Ni.Mu.No.12262/10/N and quash the same as illegal. For Petitioner :Mr.R.Gandhi For Respondents :Mr.D.Farjana Ghoushia Special Government Pleader for R1 to R3 Mr.V.Chandrasekaran for R4