- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 20 March 2023
- Bench
- Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 12905/2016
Judgment
O R D E R On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by subsequent events. By taking note of the same, W.P.(MD).No.12905 of 2016 is dismissed as infructuous without any order as to costs. Consequently, connected W.M.P.(MD).Nos. 9730 and 9731 of 2016 are closed.
20.03.2023 NCC :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No Index :Yes/No sbn To
1.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District.
2.The Tahsildar, Agastheeswaram Taluk, Kanyakumari Distict.
3.The Revenue Inspector, Kanyakumari.
4.The Senior Superintendent of Posts, Department of Posts, Kanyakumari Division, Nagercoil 629 001, Kanyakumari District. W.P.rMi)No.12905oofo2016 SENTHILKUMARoRAMAMOORTHY,oJ. sbn W.P.(MD)No.12905oofo2016 and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.9730o&o9731oofo2016
20.03.2023 Pageo4oofo4
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :20.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY and W.M.P.(MD).Nos.9730 & 9731 of 2016 G.N.Sivachandran ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Collector, Kanyakumari District. 2.The Tahsildar, Agastheeswaram Taluk, Kanyakumari Distict. 3.The Revenue Inspector, Kanyakumari. 4.The Senior Superintendent of Posts, Department of Posts, Kanyakumari Division, Nagercoil 629 001, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari call for the records pertaining to the proceedings issued by the second respondent in his C6/27975/2015 dated 09.04.2016 and signed on 26.04.2016 issued to the petitioner at the behest of the fourth respondent requisition letter in proceedings No.L/RNP/Dlgs Nagercoil dated 14.08.2015 and quash the same. For Petitioner :No appearance For Respondents :Mr.S.Kameswaran Government Advocate for R1 to R3 :Mr.P.Paul Pandi for R4
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.