VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Tamilnadu Naidu Mahajana v. The District Registrar of

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
24 March 2023
Bench
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 10266/2016

Judgment

O R D E R At the hearing on 10.03.2023, there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was listed today. Once again, there is no representation for the petitioner.

¶2Learned counsel for the second respondent submits that an election notification dated 18.05.2016 was impugned in the writ petition. Such election took place on 11.06.2016 and, in fact, about three subsequent elections also took place. Consequently, he submits that the matter has been rendered infructuous.

¶3By taking note of these developments, W.P. (MD) No.10266 of 2016 is dismissed as infructuous without any order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

24.03.2023 NCC :No Internet :Yes Index :No PKN To The District Registrar of Societies, Madurai South Regn.District, Palace Road, Mahal, Madurai 625 001.

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. PKN W.P.(MD)No.10266 of 2016

24.03.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :24.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.P.(MD)No.10266 of 2016 and W.M.P. (MD) No.8020 of 2016 Tamilnadu Naidu Mahajana Sangam, Regtd Society bearing Reg.No.132/1973, Rep. by its President P.Muthuvelraj ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The District Registrar of Societies, Madurai South Regn.District, Palace Road, Mahal, Madurai 625 001. 2. Mannar Thirumalai Naicker, College, Founded by Tamilnadu Naidu Mahajana Sangam, Registered Society Bearing Reg.No.13/1973, Rep. by its Secretary, Pasumalai, Madurai. ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the respondents culminated in Se.Ma.Na.Ka./39/2015-2016 dated 18.05.2016 of the Second respondent, and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st Respondent to settle the issue of amendment within the time frame that may be fixed by this Honble Court. For Petitioner :No appearance For Respondents :Mr.M.Prakash Additional Government Pleader for R1 Mr.S.Seenivasagan for R2

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.