VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

R.Selvi v. The Principal District &

DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
6 December 2023
Bench
S.M. Subramaniamauthor, V. Lakshminarayanan
Case no.
WP(MD) 2879/2017

Judgment

ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.) When the matter came up for hearing on 28.11.2023, there was no representation on behalf the petitioner and hence, the matter was directed to be posted under the caption "for dismissal". Accordingly, it is listed today, i.e., 06.12.2023. Even today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner. In such circumstances, this Court has no other option except to dismiss the Writ Petition for non-prosecution.

¶2Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition stands closed.

(S.M.S.,J.) (V.L.N.,J.)

06.12.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Lm To The Principal District and Sessions Judge, (The Chief Administrative Officer), The Principal District Court, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi. S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J. and V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN,J. Lm

06.12.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.12.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN and W.M.P.(MD).No.2340 of 2017 R.Selvi .. Petitioner Vs. The Principal District and Sessions Judge, (The Chief Administrative Officer), The Principal District Court, Thoothukudi District, Thoothukudi. .. Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order viz D.No.5154/A1/2016 dated 17.09.2016 of the respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.D.Venkatesh

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.