L.Saraswathi, v. The Sub-Registrar,

ORDER Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner died and the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

01.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes ssb

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ssb To

1.The Sub-Registrar, Registration Department, Chinnalapatty, Dindigul District.

2.The Joint Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Madurai.

3.The Assistant Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Dindigul. Dated : 01.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI L.Saraswathi .. Petitioner Vs. 1.The Sub-Registrar, Registration Department, Chinnalapatty, Dindigul District. 2.The Joint Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Madurai. 3.The Assistant Commissioner, HR & CE Department, Dindigul. .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the consequential proceedings of the 1st respondent dated 14.06.2018 refusing to register the petitioner's Will dated 13.06.2018 tendered for Registration on 14.06.2018 in respect of the House property and the communication of the 3rd respondent dated 23.02.2015 in Na.Ka.No.262/2008/A3 and quash the same and to issue a consequential direction to the 1st respondent to register the petitioner's Will dated 13.06.2018 forthwith, considering the orders of this Court in WP.No.1084 of 2016 dated 21.11.2017 filed by one M.Indrani. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Govindan For Respondents : Mr.M.Sarangan Additional Government Pleader