- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 20 December 2023
- Bench
- S.M. Subramaniam, V. Lakshminarayanan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 15955/2018
Judgment
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN W.P.(MD) Nos.15955, 15956 & 15957 of 2018 and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.14256, 14257, 14258 of 2018 & 21, 22 & 23 of 2019 G.Muthulakshmi ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD) No.15955 of 2018 P.Poobalan ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD) No.15956 of 2018 Rajeswari ... Petitioner in W.P.(MD) No.15957 of 2018 -vs-
1.The Tahsildar Kalaiyarkoil Taluk Sivagangai District
2.The Revenue Inspector Maravamangalam Firka Kalaiyarkoil Taluk Sivagangai District ... Respondents in all W.Ps. PRAYER (in W.P.(MD) No.15955 of 2018): Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the impugned order dated
16.07.2018, on the file of the first respondent and quash the same and further directing the first respondent to grant patta to the petitioner. PRAYER (in W.P.(MD) No.15956 of 2018): Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the impugned order dated
16.07.2018, on the file of the first respondent and quash the same and further directing the first respondent to grant patta to the petitioner. PRAYER (in W.P.(MD) No.15957 of 2018): Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the impugned order dated
16.07.2018, on the file of the first respondent and quash the same and further directing the first respondent to grant patta to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai (in all W.Ps) For Respondents : Mr.N.Satheesh Kumar (in all W.Ps.) Additional Government Pleader C O M M O N O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.] The orders passed by the respondent – Tahsildar under Section 6 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 (for brevity, "the Act"), are under challenge in the present writ petitions.
¶2Pursuant to the survey conducted by the revenue authorities and on identification of the encroachments in the burial ground, the authority concerned issued notices under Section 7 of the Act to the petitioners and they have submitted their representations / objections and thereafter, the impugned orders under Section 6 of the Act have been passed.
¶3Learned counsel for the petitioners mainly contended that the impugned orders are cryptic and no reason has been assigned and therefore, the same are to be set aside.
¶4We are unable to agree with the said contention. The Revenue Authorities are incompetent to adjudicate the title disputes or to crystallize the civil rights of the parties in such matters. If at all the petitioners possess any document to establish their title or ownership, they have to approach the competent civil court of law. Therefore, we do not find any reason to interfere with the orders impugned in the present writ petitions. However, the petitioners are at liberty to prefer appeals under Section 10 of the Act, before the appellate authority, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If any such appeals are preferred, the same are to be decided by the appellate authority, on merits and in accordance with law, without reference to the period of limitation.
¶5With the above observations, the writ petitions are dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
[S.M.S., J.] [V.L.N., J.]
20.12.2023 NCC : Index : Internet :
krk To:
1.The Tahsildar, Kalaiyarkoil Taluk, Sivagangai District.
2.The Revenue Inspector, Maravamangalam Firka, Kalaiyarkoil Taluk, Sivagangai District.
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. and V . LAKSHMINARAYANAN , J . krk W.P.(MD) Nos.15955, 15956 & 15957 of 2018 and W.M.P.(MD) Nos.14256, 14257, 14258 of 2018 & 21, 22 & 23 of 2019
20.12.2023
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.