VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Kanishka Sports Club v. The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise Department

ALLOWED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
22 September 2023
Bench
S Justice S.Srimathyauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 20510/2023

Judgment

ORDER This Writ Petition is filed to quash the order dated 17.08.2023 and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 5 to supply liquor to the petitioner's club.

¶2Through the impugned order, the respondents have suspended to supply liquor. The reason cited by the respondents is that the petitioner has evaded from paying tax to the tune of Rs.1,22,93,177/-. The contention of the petitioner is that there is no assessment as on date. The respondents have only issued pre-revision notice dated 06.04.2023, whereby, it has indicated that the petitioner has sales turnover as per return at Rs.1,10,07,041/- and the tax is payable to the same. The petitioner has submitted his objections to the said notice and as on date the respondents have not passed any order.

¶3Even in the impugned order, the respondents confirmed as on date they have not passed any order to the said pre-revision notice. When order has not been passed, the suspension of supply of liquor by citing that the petitioner has not paid tax, is illegal. Therefore, this Court is inclined to interfere with. Hence, the impugned order is quashed. The respondents are directed to supply liquor forthwith.

¶4In view of the above, this Writ Petition is allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

22.09.2023

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No Nsr To

1.The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise Department, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.

2.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar.

3.The Assistant Commissioner, Prohibition and Excise Department, Virudhunagar.

4.The Divisional Excise Officer, Aruppukkottai, Having office at Collectorate, Virudhunagar.

5.The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited, (TASMAC), Virudhunagar.

6.The Assistant Commissioner (ST)-2, Office of the Assistant Commissioner (ST)-2, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District.

S.SRIMATHY, J.

Nsr

22.09.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.09.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Kanishka Sports Club, Represented by its Secretary, G.Pandi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise Department, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. 2.The District Collector, Virudhunagar District, Virudhunagar. 3.The Assistant Commissioner, Prohibition and Excise Department, Virudhunagar. 4.The Divisional Excise Officer, Aruppukkottai, Having office at Collectorate, Virudhunagar. 5.The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited, (TASMAC), Virudhunagar. 6.The Assistant Commissioner (ST)-2, Office of the Assistant Commissioner (ST)-2, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the second respondent in Na.Ka.Ka2.60-05-2023, dated 17.08.2023 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 5 to supply liquor to the petitioner's club. For Petitioner : Mr.T.Bashyam For R-1 to R-2 : Mr.B.Saravanan, R-4 and R-6 : Additional Government Pleader. For R-5 : Mr.H.Arumugam, Standing Counsel.

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.