- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 30 November 2023
- Bench
- S Justice S.Srimathy
- Case no.
- SA(MD) 207/2018
Judgment
JUDGMENT This Second appeal is filed against the Judgement and Decree, dated
24.02.2016 passed in A.S.No.91 of 2012 reversing the judgment and decree dated
08.11.2012 passed in E.A.No.18 of 2010 n E.P.No.71 of 2008 in O.S.No.1516 of 1969.
¶2The appellant is the plaintiff in the suit filed for partition. The appellant obtained a final decree in I.A.No.120 of 1985 in O.S.No.1516 of 1969 and had filed an Execution Petition to execute the said final decree in E.P.No.71 of 2008. The first respondent / third party had filed E.A.No.18 of 2010 as a third-party claimant over the suit property but the said E.A. was dismissed. Aggrieved over the first appeal in A.S.No.91 od 2012 was filed and the Lower Appellate Court reversed the findings of the Executant Court passed in E.A.No.18 of 2010. Aggrieved over the plaintiff, the decree holder had filed this second appeal and the same was admitted on the various substantial question of law.
¶3The Learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant as well as the Respondents submitted that against the Final Decree in I.A.No.120 of 1985, second appeal in S.A.No.255 of 2005 was filed and the same was allowed vide judgment dated 13.04.20016. Aggrieved over Civil Appeal No.21834 of 2017 was filed before Hon'ble Supreme Court and the said appeal was allowed vide judgment dated 15.05.2018, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court had remitted the case back to the Trial Court. Therefor this Court is of the considered opinion that the present second appeal cannot be entertained when the I.A.No.120 of 1985 was remanded back for retrial.
¶4Accordingly, the present Second Appeal is dismissed. However, the rights of the parties will be determined as per Judgment passed by the Trial Court which would be passed based on the remand order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court. The Appellant is at liberty to implead the respondents as parties in the re-trial which is pending before the Trial Court, if so advised. No Costs. Index : Yes / No
30.11.2023 Internet : Yes
KSA To
¶1The Subordinate Court, Kulithurai.
¶2The Principal District Munsif Court, Kulithurai.
¶3The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. S.SRIMATHY, J KSA S.A(MD)No. 207 of 2018
30.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY S.A(MD)No. 207 of 2018 Selvi ... Appellant Vs. 1. Christopher 2. Vasudevan Pillai [Died] 3. Indira Amma 4. Vilasini 5. Pangajam 6. Ravindran 7. Lathakumari 8. Shaji 9. Vasumathi Amma 10. Gopalakrishnan Nair 11. Sagadeva Panicker 12. Appukuttan Nair 13. Raghavan @ Raghuvaran Nair 14. Lalitha 15. Surekha 16. Sujithara 17. Aiswarya 18. Srikumari Devi 19. G.S.Vinod 20. G.S.Manoj 21. G.S.Santhosh 22. S.Anubama ... Respondents PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and Decree, dated 24.02.2016 in A.S.No.91 of 2012 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Kulithurai reversing the Judgment and Decree, dated 08.11.2012 in E.A.No.18 of 2010 in E.P.No.71 of 2008 in O.S.No.1516 of 1969 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Kulithurai. For Appellant : Mr.C.Mahadevan For Respondents : Mr.C.K.M.Appaji, for R-1 : R-3, 6 to 13 & 14- No appearance
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.