- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 1 December 2023
- Bench
- The Chief Justice, S Justice L.Victoria Gowri
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 8958/2018
Judgment
O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble CHIEF JUSTICE] We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Special Government Advocate for the respondents 1 to 4 and the learned counsel for the respondent No.5.
¶2It is submitted by the learned Advocate for the petitioner that Section 7 notice under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 has been issued. The petitioner has filed a suit for injunction. The land in question is a natham land. The respondent could not have issued notice under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 (in short, 'Act, 1905')
¶3The notice under Section 7 of the Act, 1905 is in the nature of show cause notice soliciting reply from the petitioner. The petitioner has already filed a reply. Naturally, the authority before proceeding under Section 6 of the Act, 1905 has to consider the reply and the documents filed by the petitioner.
¶4In light of that, while taking decision under Section 6 of the Act, 1905, the authority shall consider the reply filed by the petitioner.
¶5The writ petition stands disposed of. However, there is no order as to costs. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. [S.V.G., .C.J.] [L.V.G., J.]
01.12.2023 Index : Yes / No : Yes / No
RR To:
¶1The District Collector, Sivagangai District.
¶2The Tahsildar, Sivagangai Taluk Sivagangai District.
¶3The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar, Okkur, Sivagangai Taluk , Sivagangai District.
¶4The Revenue Inspector, Madagupatti Firka, Sivagangai Taluk, Sivagangai District. W.P.(MD)No.8958 of 2018 THE HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE and L.VICTORIA GOWRI , J . RR W.P.(MD)No.8958 of 2018
01.12.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE and THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI W.P.(MD) No.8958 of 2018 and WMP(MD) Nos.8370 and 8371 of 2018 Sigappi ... Petitioner Vs 1. The District Collector, Sivagangai District. 2. The Tahsildar, Sivagangai Taluk Sivagangai District. 3. The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar, Okkur, Sivagangai Taluk , Sivagangai District. 4. The Revenue Inspector, Madagupatti Firka, Sivagangai Taluk, Sivagangai District. 5. Subramanian, Udayan, North Street, Kadaneri Village, Sivagangai District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order of the 4th respondent dated 12.03.2018 and impugned order of 3rd respondent dated 10.4.2018 quash the same and consequently direct the respondents herein not to interfere with the petitioners occupied natham in Survey No.137/2 in Kadaneri Village & Group, Sivagangai Taluk, Sivagangai District admesuring 0.05.0 Ares. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Srinivasaraghavan For Respondent : Mr.S.P.Maharajan for R1 to R4 Special Government Pleader Mr.C.Arul Vadivel @ Sekar for R5
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.