- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 31 October 2023
- Bench
- Battu Devanand
- Case no.
- CRP(MD) 2702/2018
Judgment
O R D E R This Civil Revision Petition is filed against the order dated 08.11.2018 passed in I.A.No.626 of 2018 in O.S.No.637 of 2006 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Tenkasi.
¶2This Court called for the report from the concerned Principal District Judge, by order dated 19.10.2023 with regard to the status of the suit in the trial Court. Accordingly, the concerned Principal District Judge, has sent a report wherein, it is stated that the suit in O.S.No.637 of 2006 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Tenkasi, is dismissed by its decree and judgment, dated 08.01.2019.
¶3In view of the above, as already the suit itself is dismissed, in the considered opinion of this Court, nothing survives for further adjudication in this Civil Revision Petition.
¶4Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
¶5No costs.
¶6Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
31.10.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No RM To The Additional District Munsif, Additional District Munsif Court, Tenkasi.
BATTU DEVANAND, J. RM C.R.P(MD) No.2702 of 2018
31.10.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 31.10.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND C.R.P(MD) No.2702 of 2018 and C.M.P. (MD) No.11935 of 2018 M. Abdul Salam ...Petitioner Vs. 1. B.B. Sahul Hameed 2. Mariyam Beevi 3. Mohammed Ismail Abdul Kadar (died) Ismail Moideen (died) 4. Sahul Hammed 5. Mohammed Ismail 6. Dhivan Meeral 7. Nabishaal 8. Shajihan 9. Rahamathulla 10. Sherif 11. Sheeba 12. S. Abdul Kadar ....Respondents PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the Fair and Decreetal order dated 08.11.2018 passed in I.A.No.626 of 2018 in O.S.No.637 of 2006 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Tenkasi, and allow this Civil Revision Petition. For Petitioner : Mr.Niranjan S.Kumar For Respondents : Mr.M.P.Senthil – for RR 2 & 3 Mr.S.Vankadesh – for R12 No Appearance – for RR1, 3, 5 & 6 Dismissed – for RR4, 7 to 9 Exoneration memo filed–for RR10 & 11
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.