Pandiyarajan, v. The Director of Fisheries

ORDER Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶2In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

04.12.2023 ssb NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No. To

¶1The Director of Fisheries, Fisheries Department, Administrative Buildings, Theyampet, Chennai.

2.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.

3.The Assistant Director of Fisheries, Petchiammanpadithurai, Madurai-1.

B.PUGALENDHI, J. ssb

04.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 04.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI Pandiyarajan ... Petitioner versus 1. The Director of Fisheries, Fisheries Department, Administrative Buildings, Theyampet, Chennai. 2.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 3.The Assistant Director of Fisheries, Petchiammanpadithurai, Madurai-1. ... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to conduct the tender for fisheries right at Virathanur Kanmoi based on the petitioner's representation dated 22.12.2017. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Muniyandi For Respondents : Mr.J.K.Jayaseelan Government Advocate