M.Thangaraj, v. Mariammal,

JUDGMENT When the matter was taken up for hearing on 08.11.2023, the learned counsel for the appellants had reported no instructions. Hence, the matter is listed today under the caption "for dismissal". Even today, the learned counsel for the appellants submitted that there was no instructions on the side of the appellants. Hence, the Second Appeal stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

17.11.2023 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No Nsr TO:

1.The Sub-Court, Srivilliputtur.

2.The Principal District Munsif Court, Srivilliputtur.

3.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

S.SRIMATHY, J.

Nsr S.A.(MD)No.41 of 2018 Dated:

17.11.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY and C.M.P.(MD).No.719 of 2018 1.M.Thangaraj 2.Lakshmi ... Appellants /Vs./ Mariammal ...Respondent P RAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and Decree passed by the Hon'ble Sub Court, Srivilliputtur in A.S.No.14 of 2012 dated 09.08.2016 modifying the Judgment and Decree of the Hon'ble Principal District Munsiff Court, Srivilliputtur in O.S.No.272 of 2008 dated 28.10.2011 and set aside the same and dismiss the suit. For Appellants : Mr.Lakshmi Gopinathan, For M/s.Polax Legal Solutions For Respondent : Mr.K.C.Ramalingam