VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Joseph v. Senthilnathan Chettiar (Died)

DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
21 December 2023
Bench
S Justice S.Srimathyauthor
Case no.
SA(MD) 108/2018

Judgment

JUDGMENT When the second appeal was taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the appellant as well for the respondents. Hence, the second appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

21.12.2023 Index : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No Tmg TO:

¶1Subordinate Judge, Sivagangai.

¶2District Munsif Court, Sivagangai.

¶3The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

S.SRIMATHY, J.

Tmg S.A.(MD)No.108 of 2018 Dated:

21.12.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY and C.M.P.(MD)Nos.2586 and 2587 of 2018 Joseph ... Appellant /Vs./ Senthilnathan Chettiar (Died) 1.Mariaraj 2.Albert 3.James 4.Alakammai Achi 5.Veerappan 6.Sarasvathi ...Respondents P RAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and Decree, dated 27.11.2017, passed in A.S.No.117 of 2013 on the file of the Learned Subordinate Judge, Sivagangai, confirming the Judgment and Decree, dated 19.07.2013, passed in O.S.No.142 of 2010 on the file of the Learned District Munsif Court, Sivagangai. For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance *****

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.