- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 17 April 2023
- Bench
- Abdul Quddhose
- Case no.
- SA(MD) 614/2022
Judgment
JUDGMENT This matter is listed under the caption 'For Dismissal' today. There is no representation on the side of the appellants once again. The learned counsel appearing for the first respondent is present.
¶2Even on last two hearing dates, ie., on 18.10.2022 and
30.03.2023, there was no representation on the side of the appellants. It can now be inferred that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the Second Appeal. Accordingly, this Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
17.04.2023 Index : Yes / No NCC : Yes / No Sm TO:
1.The Sub Court, Aranthangi.
2.The District Munsif Court, Aranthangi.
3.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.
Sm Dated:
17.04.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.04.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Jeganathan (died) 1.Chellammal (died) 2.Saravanan 3.Ravichandran ... Appellants /Vs./ 1.Jeyalakshmi 2.Subbulakshmi 3.Dravida Selvi 4.Thirumaran ... Respondents P RAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code to set aside the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.35 of 2017, on the file of the Sub Court, Aranthangi, dated 09.04.2019 confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.134 of 2008 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Aranthangi, dated 31.07.2013 by allowing this second appeal. For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.R.Balakrishnan (R1)
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.