- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 3 November 2023
- Bench
- S Justice S.Srimathy
- Case no.
- CONT P(MD) 1760/2023
Judgment
O R D E R Against the order passed by this Court in writ petition, the respondents had preferred a writ appeal in W.A.(MD)No.1094 of 2023 and the said writ appeal was allowed.
2.Hence, the contempt petition is closed. No costs. Index : Yes / No
03.11.2023 Internet : Yes Tmg S.SRIMATHY, J
Tmg
03.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.11.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY G.Sakthi Rao ... Petitioner vs. P.Uma Maheswari, The Secretary, Tamilnadu Public Service Commission, TNPSC Road, Park Town, Chennai-600 003. ... Contemnor PRAYER: Petition filed under under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for wilfully disobeying and not complying with the order of this Court, dated 20.01.2023, in W.P.(MD)No.26878 of 2019. For Petitioners : Mr.G.Sakthi Rao For Contemnor : Mr.J.Anand Kumar *****
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.