VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

M. Jeyaraman v. Kumar

CLOSED
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
18 August 2023
Bench
S.S. Sundarauthor, D.Bharatha Chakravarthy
Case no.
CONT P(MD) 1343/2023

Judgment

O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by S.S.SUNDAR, J.] The petitioner has filed this contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of the order of this Court, dated 17.12.2021, passed in W.P.(MD) No.22416 of 2021.

¶2The petitioner earlier filed a writ petition in W.P.(MD) No.22416 of 2021 for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to conduct an enquiry and take appropriate action based on the outcome of the enquiry, by considering his representation dated 23.08.2021. The said writ petition was disposed of by this Court by order 17.12.2021, in the following lines: "6.Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and also taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for in the writ petition, this Court directs the third respondent to consider the petitioner's representation, dated

23.08.2021, and pass appropriate orders, on merits and in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and respondent Nos.4 and 5, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order."

¶3Pursuant to the said order, it appears that the Inspector of Panchayats, namely, District Collector has initiated proceedings in terms of Section 205 of the Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994 and pursuant to the directions of the Inspector of Panchayats, the Tahsildar, Sivagangai, has also commenced enquiry as contemplated under Section 205(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act, 1994.

¶4Since proceedings for removal of the Panchayat President have been set in motion, by invoking the statutory power of the Inspector of Panchayats / District Collector, this Court finds that the steps taken by the respondents are in compliance with the directions issued by this Court.

¶5Hence, this contempt petition is closed.

[S.S.S.R., J.] [D.B.C., J.]

18.08.2023 NCC : Index : Internet :

krk To:

1.Mr.Kumar, Assistant Director (Panchayat), Sivagangai.

2.Mr.Padmanathan, Block Development Officer (V.P.), Sivagangai Panchayat Union, Sivagangai.

3.Ms.Asha Ajith, District Collector, O/o.the District Collector, Sivagangai.

S.S.SUNDAR, J. and

D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. krk in W.P.(MD) No.22416 of 2021

18.08.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 18.08.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY in W.P.(MD) No.22416 of 2021 M.Jeyaraman ... Petitioner -vs- 1.Kumar Assistant Director (Panchayat) Sivagangai 2.Padmanathan Block Development Officer (V.P.) Sivagangai Panchayat Union Sivagangai 3.Asha Ajith District Collector O/o.the District Collector Sivagangai ... Respondents PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the respondents for the willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD) No.22416 of 2021, dated 17.12.2021. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Ganesan For Respondents : Mr.Veera Kathiravan Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.J.K.Jayaseelan Government Advocate

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.