- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 28 June 2023
- Bench
- R. Subramanian, S Justice L.Victoria Gowri
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 15577/2023
Judgment
O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.] In view of the fact that the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Madurai, is not manned, we are entertaining this writ petition.
¶2Mr.P.Madan Alexander, learned counsel, takes notice for the respondent - Bank.
¶3With the consent of both sides, this writ petition is taken up for final hearing at the admission stage itself.
¶4The sale notice, dated 26.05.2023, issued by the respondent - Bank, is under challenge in this writ petition.
¶5The sale is scheduled to be held on 30.06.2023.
¶6Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner would be able to liquidate the debt, if sometime is granted to him.
¶7Learned counsel for the respondent – Bank would submit that since the petitioner's loan account has become a non performing asset (NPA), he does not deserve any indulgence.
¶8Considering the plea made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and with a view to give an opportunity to the petitioner to save the secured asset, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:
(i) The respondent – Bank can proceed with the sale, but, it shall not confirm the same, if the petitioner pays a sum of Rs.16,30,666/- (Rupees sixteen lakhs thirty thousand six hundred and sixty six only) to the respondent – Bank, on or before 28.07.2023.
(ii) The balance amount of Rs.60,00,000/- (Rupees sixty lakhs only) shall be paid by the petitioner in six equated monthly installments commencing from August, 2023. The monthly installments shall be paid on or before 28th of every succeeding month.
(iii) The interest payable for the interregnum period and the cost of the sale shall be paid along with the last installment.
(iv) If there is a default in payment as directed above, the respondent – Bank can proceed with the sale. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
[R.S.M., J.] [L.V.G., J.]
28.06.2023
NCC : Index : Internet :
krk R.SUBRAMANIAN , J . and L.VICTORIA GOWRI , J . krk and W.M.P.(MD) No.13090 of 2023
28.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI and W.M.P.(MD) No.13090 of 2023 M/s.S.N.Polymers Proprietor V.Naresh Shed No.41A SIDCO Industrial Estate Kappalur, Madurai District ... Petitioner -vs- Canara Bank rep.by its Authorized Officer Madurai West Avani Moola Street Branch No.10 Madurai West Avani Moola Street Madurai Main Madurai District ... Respondent PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the entire records in relation to the impugned sale notice dated 26.05.2023, issued by the respondent and quash the same as arbitrary and illegal and further grant some breathing time for the petitioner to repay the loan due within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vidhya Sagar For Respondent : Mr.P.Madan Alexander
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.