- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 15 November 2023
- Bench
- Battu Devanand
- Case no.
- CRP(MD) 1666/2019
Judgment
O R D E R Mr.D.Venkatesh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the subsequent developments happened after filing of this Civil Revision Petition, no further adjudication is required in this Civil Revision Petition.
¶2The statement of the learned counsel is endorsed by the learned counsel for the respondent also.
¶3In view of the above, in the considered opinion of this Court, nothing survives for further adjudication in this Civil Revision Petition.
¶4Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
¶5No costs.
¶6Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
15.11.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No RM To The Principal Subordinate Judge, Principal Subordinate Court, Dindigul.
BATTU DEVANAND, J. RM C.R.P(MD) No.1666 of 2019
15.11.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 15.11.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND C.R.P(MD) No.1666 of 2019 and C.M.P. (MD) No.8631 of 2019 Natarajan ...Petitioner Vs. Sivasubramanian ...Respondent PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair order and decreetal order dated 22.10.2018 passed in I.A.No.689 of 2017 in O.S.No.453 of 2015 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Dindigul. For Petitioner : Mr. D.Venkatesh For Respondent : Mr. S.Sankar
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.