- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 6 January 2023
- Bench
- P.D.Audikesavalu
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 16874/2021
Judgment
ORDER Heard Mr. D.Anbarasu, Learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. M.Senthil Ayyanar, Learned Government Advocate appearing for the Respondent.
¶2The Petitioner had sought registration of the vehicles, which is bearing Chassis No. MAT457018G7A01005 and Engine No. 497TC44ATY801816 to the Respondent, which was manufactured during the period when Bharat Stage-III (BS-III) Emission Standards was in force. Since the said vehicle did not comply with the requirements of Bharat Stage IV Emission Standards, the Respondent by Proceedings in A. Thi. Mu. No. 67671/C3/2017 dated
03.02.2021 refused to register the same, which is challenged in this Writ Petition.
¶3The Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the decision in M.C.Mehta -vs-Union of India [(2017) 7 SCC 243] has held as follows:- "14. Accordingly, for detailed reasons that will follow, we direct that:
14.1. On and from 1-4-2017 such vehicles that are not BS-IV compliant shall not be sold in India by any manufacturer or dealer, that is to say that such vehicles whether two-wheeler, three-wheeler, four-wheeler or commercial vehicles will not be sold in India by any manufacturer or dealer on and from 1-4-2017.
14.2. All the vehicle registering authorities under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 are prohibited from registering such vehicles on and from 1-4-2017 that do not meet BS-IV emission standards, except on proof that such a vehicle has already been sold on or before 31-3-2017." Subsequently, by another order dated 27.03.2020 in I.A. Nos. 45883, 45912 and 48113 of 2020 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 13029 of 1985, it has been held that even BS-IV compliant vehicles cannot be registered after
31.03.2020. In view of the aforesaid legal position, there does not appear to be any acceptable reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the Respondent.
¶4In fine, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.
06.01.2023 pkn Index : Yes/No Note: Issue order copy by 27.01.2023. To The Assistant Registering Authority, Regional Transport Office, Madurai (South), Madurai District. P.D.AUDIKESAVALU,J. pkn
06.01.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.01.2023 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.D.AUDIKESAVALU M/s. Non Stop Venture Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Director Mr.Syed Anwar ... Petitioner Vs. The Assistant Registering Authority, Regional Transport Office, Madurai (South), Madurai District. ... Respondent PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records from the impugned order issued by the respondent A.Thi.Mu.No.67671/C3/2017 dated 03.02.2021 and quash the same and consequently to direct the respondent to register the vehicle which having Chassis No.MAT457018G7A01005 and Engine No.497TC44ATY801816. For Petitioners : Mr. D.Anbarasu For Respondent : Mr. M.Senthil Ayyanar Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.