VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Sri Pookuzhi Shakthi Muthulakshmi Amman Sri Sonaisamy Temple v. The Estate Officer

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
3 July 2023
Bench
S. Vaidyanathanauthor, D.Bharatha Chakravarthy
Case no.
WP(MD) 15847/2023

Judgment

O R D E R [Order of the Court was made by S.VAIDYANATHAN, J.] Mr.K.Govindarajan, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India, takes notice for the respondents.

¶2With the consent of both sides, this writ petition is taken up for final hearing at the stage of admission itself.

¶3The prayer in this writ petition is to quash the Form-B, dated

30.05.2023, issued by the first respondent, directing removal of encroachment made in the form of a Temple i.e. Sri Pookuzhi Shakthi Muthulakshmi Amman, Sri Sonaisamy Temple, over the Railway land and to direct the first respondent to permit the petitioner to continue the worship of the said Temple.

¶4At the outset, it is pertinent to note that the petitioner has got an effective alternative remedy before the appropriate forum by filing a civil miscellaneous appeal, under the provisions of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971. Hence, we are not inclined to grant the relief sought for by the petitioner. However, while rejecting the plea, the petitioner is given liberty to raise all the factual and legal submissions available to him before appropriate forum. It is made clear that the period during which the writ petition was pending before this Court shall be excluded for the purpose of computing the period of limitation.

¶5Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.

[S.V.N., J.] [D.B.C., J.]

03.07.2023 NCC : Index : Internet :

Note to Office: Return the original impugned order to the petitioner, after obtaining necessary acknowledgement and retaining a xerox copy, if not available in the typed set of papers. krk To:

1.The Estate Officer, Southern Railway, The Divisional Office - Works Branch, Madurai-625 010.

2.The General Manager, Southern Railway, Chennai-600 010.

3.The Director, Archeological Survey of India, Dharohar Bhavan, No.24, Tilak Marg, New Delhi-110 001. S.VAIDYANATHAN , J . and D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY , J . krk

03.07.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 03.07.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and W.M.P.(MD) No.13259 of 2023 Sri Pookuzhi Shakthi Muthulakshmi Amman Sri Sonaisamy Temple through its President V.G.Ramdoss S/o.V.R.Govindan No.116, Railway Colony Madurai-625 010 ... Petitioner -vs- 1.The Estate Officer Southern Railway The Divisional Office - Works Branch Madurai-625 010 2.The General Manager Southern Railway Chennai-600 010 3.The Director Archeological Survey of India Dharohar Bhavan No.24, Tilak Marg New Delhi-110 001 ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned order in Form-B dated 30.05.2023 issued by the first respondent and quash the same as null and void and consequently direct the first respondent to continue the worship in the petitioner's temple Sri Pookuzhi Shakthi Muthulakshmi Amman, Sri Sonaisamy Temple, situated at No.116, Railway Colony, Madurai-625 010. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Khari Kharadas For Respondents : Mr.K.Govindarajan Deputy Solicitor General of India

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.