- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 15 June 2023
- Bench
- C.V. Karthikeyan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 16112/2022
Judgment
O R D E R The Writ Petition has been filed in the nature of a Certiorarified Mandamus seeking records in RFL/Kodaikanal/124/2021 dated 14.12.2021 on the file of the respondent herein and set aside the same. The petitioner had presented a decree in O.S.No.45 of 2004 dated
14.09.2005 on the file of the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Kodaikanal, for registration. The same was refused to be registered.
¶2Placing reliance on Section 23 of the Indian Registration Act, 1908, the respondent themselves have pass a circular that with respect to registration of a Court decree, there is no period of limitation.
¶3A direction is given to the respondent herein to register the Court decree, if it is otherwise in order whenever it is presented through proper procedure within a period of three weeks from the date of its presentation.
¶4With the above directions, the Writ petition stands allowed. No costs.
15.06.2023 Index :Yes/No Internet :Yes/No NCC : Yes / No RM To The Sub Registrar (Registration), Kodaikanal, Dindigul District.
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J. RM
15.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN Brain Herold Broderick Jenkins ... Petitioner Vs. The Sub Registrar (Registration), Kodaikanal, Dindigul District. ... Respondent PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the record of the proceedings in RFL/Kodaikanal/124/2021 dated 14.12.2021 on the file of the respondent and quash the same as illegal incompetent and without jurisdiction and consequently direct the respondent to register the judgement and decree in O.S.No.45 of 2004 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kodaikanal, dated 14.09.2005. For Petitioner : Mr.H.Lakshmi Shankar For Respondent : Mr.C.Satheesh, Government Advocate
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.