Nandhakumar v. L.Vinitha Kumari

ORDER This Civil Revision Petition has been filed by the petitioner to set aside the order passed in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in H.M.O.P.No.5 of 2022 dated 01.02.2023, on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Tirunelveli.

2.The petitioner challenged the impugned order passed by the Family Court in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in H.M.O.P.No.5 of 2022 dated

01.02.2023. The operative portion of the impugned order reads as follows:- "kDjhuUk; mtUila kDtpy; jpUkzj;jpy; NghJ mtuJ ngw;NwhUf;F ghj;jpag;gl;l &gp igau; xu;f;];

epWtdj;ij

elj;jp

te;jjhf xg;Gf;nfhz;Ls;shu;.

NkYk;

&gp

];ghu;f;y]; cupikahsuhf ,e;j vjpu;kDjhuu; ngaUk; krhM 7y; fhzg;gLfpwJ. mjpy; epWtdj;jpy; nkhj;j Nld; Xtuhf 40 yl;rk; Kjy; 50 yl;rk; fhl;lg;gl;Ls;sJ. kDjhuu; jw;NghJ Ngf;lup Nkd[uhf xU epWtdj;jpy; khjk; &.15 Mapuk; rk;ghjpg;gjhf Fwpg;gpl;bUe;jhYk; mjw;fhd Mtzq;fs; jhf;fy; nra;atpy;iy. ,e;j epiyapy; ,e;j tof;F KbAk; fhyk; tiuf;Fk; kDjhuuUk; mtuJ Foe;ijAk; [Ptdk; nra;tjw;Fk; tof;if elj;Jtjw;F VJthf ,e;j tof;F rhd;whtzq;fs; kw;Wk; ,Ujug;G thjk; Mfpaitfis itj;Jk;

vjpu;kDjhuu;

kDjhuUf;Fk;

mtuJ Foe;ijf;Fk; khjk; &.20>000/- xt;nthU Mq;fpy khjKk; 5 Njjpf;Fs; kDjhuu; trk; Neubahf ,e;j kD cj;juthd Njjp Kjy; nrYj;jp tpl Ntz;Lk; vd;W cj;jutplg;gLfpwJ. ,e;f cj;jputhdJ vd;dhy; jl;lr;rUf;F nrhy;yg;gl;L mtuhy; Neubahf fzpdpapy; jl;lr;R nra;ag;gl;L vd;dhy; rupghu;f;fg;gl;L ,d;W 2023 k; Mz;L gpg;utup jpq;fs; 01k; ehs; ,e;ePjpkd;wj;jpy; mitawpa gfug;gl;lJ."

3.The specific case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is employed in a private firm and is earning only Rs.15,000/-. That apart, it is submitted that the petitioner has paid a sum of Rs.7,00,000/- to the respondent towards her personal expenditure in the year 2012 through bank account. Awarding interim maintenance of Rs.20,000/- to the respondent is unwarranted and the income of the respondent according to the petitioner is Rs.30,000/- per month, which may be sufficient to maintain herself.

4.The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is only working as the Factory Manager in a private concern M/s.Sunshine Fire Works, Sivakasi and earning only a meagre sum of Rs.15,000/- as salary per month. However, there are no records that has been produced by the petitioner to substantiate his claim. That apart the impugned order records that the petitioner is running a concern by name, Ruby Fire Works.

5.There is no scope for interfering in the impugned order. This Civil Revision Petition challenging the impugned order is liable to be dismissed and it is accordingly, dismissed. The Additional Sub Court, Tirunelveli, shall endeavour dispose of the main H.M.O.P.No.5 of 2022 as expeditious as possible preferably within a period of 15 months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

22.06.2023 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Mrn C.SARAVANAN

,J.

Mrn To

1.The Additional Sub Judge, Tirunelveli.

2.The Section Officer Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

22.06.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.06.2023 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and C.M.P.(MD)No.7099 of 2023 R.Nandhakumar ...Petitioner/Respondent/Petitioner Vs. L.Vinitha Kumari ... Respondent/Petitioner/Respondent PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside fair and decreetal order dated 01.02.2023 made in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in H.M.O.P.No.5 of 2022 on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Tirunelveli. For Petitioner : Mr.M.U.Mohammed Aslam For M/s.Ajmal Associates