VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Madras High Court 2023 › High Court of Madras

Shanmugam Chettiar.P v. The District Collector

DISPOSED OF
Court
High Court of Madras
Decided
23 June 2023
Bench
C.V. Karthikeyanauthor
Case no.
WP(MD) 13317/2023

Judgment

O R D E R Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner had stated that the third respondent had passed an order and therefore, the issues raised in the writ petition have become infructuous.

2.Since the issue has been addressed by the third respondent, this writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. However, liberty is given to the petitioner, if he has any grievance against the order issued by the third respondent, he may take it up further, in the manner known to law.

23.06.2023 NCS : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes/ No PNM To

¶1The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

¶2The District Revenue Officer, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.

¶3The Assistant Collector, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.

¶4The Tahsildar, W.P(Mi)No.13317oofo2023 ooooParamakudi,oRamanathapuramoDistrict. C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,oJ. oooooooooooooooooo PNM oooooORDERoINo W.P(MD).No.13317oofo2023 andoWMP(MD)Nos.11223,o11225oofo2023 oooooooooooooo

23.06.2023

Case details

Parties and counsel

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.06.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN W.P(MD).No.13317 of 2023 and WMP(MD)Nos.11223, 11225 of 2023 P.Shanmugam Chettiar ... Petitioner Vs 1. The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram. 2. The District Revenue Officer, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District. 3. The Assistant Collector, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District. 4. The Tahsildar, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District. 5. Kalyani ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned notice, dated 29.05.2023 issued by the third respondent vide proceeding Na.Ka.A3/5549/2023 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondent no.1 and 2 to transfer the enquiry in respect of the property comprised in S.No. 502/12 admeasuring to an extent of 85 sq. ft situated at Parthibanur Village Paramakudi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District from the file of the third respondent to any other competent officer by considering the petitioner's representations, dated 29.05.2023 and 05.06.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.C. Senthil Murugan For R1 to R4 : Mr.J.Ashok Additional Government Pleader For R5 : Mr.K.Jaser Arasath

Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.