Tmt. Kathar Beevi v. Sikkandar Padhusha

ORDER The learned counsel for the respondent states that pursuant to the order of eviction passed by the learned Rent Controller and there being no interim order granted by the appellate authority, the landlord has proceeded to take delivery of possession through Court process and therefore, nothing survives for consideration in the present civil revision petition.

¶2The learned counsel for the petitioner would also admit the fact that the revision petitioner has already been dispossessed in the manner known to law.

¶3Recording the submission of both counsels, this civil revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

04.12.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No RR To

1.The Sub Court/Rent Control Appellate Authority, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District

2.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

P.B.BALAJI, J.

RR CRP(PD) (MD) No.2144 of 2019

04.12.2023

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.12.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI CRP (PD)(MD) No.2144 of 2019 and CMP(MD) No.11295 of 2019 1. Tmt. Kathar Beevi, 2. Mohamed Maideen, ... Petitioners Vs Sikkandar Padhusha, S/o.Shajahan, No.15-A, Nallur Muslim North St, Aruppukottai Town, Virudhunagar District. ... Respondent PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the Fair and Decreetal order dated 29.01.2019 made in IA No.20 of 2018 in Unfiled RCA No. ... of 2018 Sub Court/Rent Control Appellate Authority, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Saravanakumar For Respondents : Mr.J.Barathan