- Court
- High Court of Madras
- Decided
- 12 June 2023
- Bench
- C.V. Karthikeyan
- Case no.
- WP(MD) 13101/2022
Judgment
O R D E R The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and has made an endorsement to that effect.
¶2In view of the submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
12.06.2023 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No ssb To The Sub Registrar, Idaikal, Kadayanallur Taluk, Tenkasi District.
C.V. KARTHIKEYAN, J. ssb
12.06.2023
Case details
Parties and counsel
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.06.2023 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN W.M.P(MD).No.9310 of 2022 M.Rahamath Beevi @ Rahamath Begam ... Petitioner Vs. The Sub Registrar, Idaikal, Kadayanallur Taluk, Tenkasi District. ...Respondent PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned return check slip with original sale deed issued by the respondent in his proceedings in Refusal No.RFL/Idaikal/42/2022 dated 05.05.2022 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondent to register the sale deed dated 05.05.2022 presented by the petitioner for the registration and release the same to the petitioner as per the time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Jeyakumaran For Respondent : Mr.C.Satheesh Government Pleader
Source: High Court of Madras, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.